Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Gold Monitoring Thread £ GBP only


Paul
Message added by ChrisSilver

This topic is to discuss price action in GBP, to discuss price action in $ USD, please see this topic: https://thesilverforum.com/topic/19962-gold-monitoring-thread-usd-only/

📌 For general non PM chat there is the Hangout topic here: 

 

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, HonestMoneyGoldSilver said:

Honestly none of that makes sense to me

You're describing a short squeeze on gold, which would send gold to the moon on a few laps around Pluto.

The west does not control precious metals trading - already 55%+ is Asia-Pacific and that does not mean the other 45% is the USA. The USA is a major producer and important market but it's smaller than the EU + UK. It's also not the largest gold producer, with South America, Canada, Australia, China and Russia being substantially larger gold producers than the USA. Note also the EU central banks/Treasuries own substantially more gold than the Fed/US Treasury

While gold on western markets might be priced in USD and controlled by the COMEX-LBMA cartel, gold is a global commodity with many inputs that are not denoted in USD (vast majority of gold mining and refining is outside the USA). The Moscow-Shanghai exchange is practically divorced from London-New York

In the scenario you outlined above, the value of unallocated paper gold might go to zero but the value of physical gold and allocated gold would go in the opposite direction. If the USA or any other nation put an arbitrary floor on the "free market" price of gold, the free market would sell it to another country and accept Euros, GBP, Yen, oil, wheat or anything else of equivalent market value

When it comes to ETFs or other allocated funds, the rule is already 1:1 in the west. For every ounce of gold sold via allocated funds, there is an ounce of gold sitting in a vault somewhere. There is no reason why that market should abruptly come to a halt. Unallocated gold is a different story though. 

The real reason to own gold is for it to be physically in your custody and NOT tied to the financial system or modern technology. 

The US Treasury are the lawful owner of 8134 tonnes of gold, the Federal Reserve handed over the ownership of that official gold reserves to the Treasury in 1934 in return for gold certificates (non redeemable for gold, only redeemable for cash, paper gold). The Fed remain the custodians of the gold. The gold certificates are valued on the Fed's books at $42.22/ounce. 8134 x $42.22 book value, 8134 x $2111 market value assuming a market spot gold price of $2111/ounce. The Fed could 1:1 sell paper gold in London and buy 50 x 8134 tonnes of physical gold in Shanghai i.e. around 60,000 tonnes of gold, that supplemented with the Treasury's 8000 odd tonnes is around 70% of the entire worlds financial gold value/amount (200,000 tonnes of total world gold of which around half of that is in the form of jewelry, half in financial gold).

When the Fed sells paper-gold to buy physical gold in a 1:1 ratio the market price of gold would tend to remain relatively level, swaps out paper gold for physical gold. Subsequently the Fed could at any time sell some/all of that physical gold in isolation and provided it did so for a $42.22 or higher price overall it would not have lost any money/book-value. With such a big seller in the market the price of gold would tend to be (significantly) lowered (supply/demand).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, modofantasma said:

Buy order got slipped up to 2387 but not by much for CPI standards 

Just closed. That'll do for the week 🥱

+1 (just now)

Sold the 42 ounces I bought literally minutes before the General Election was announced (6+ weeks back), when the priced dived from my £1893/ounce price I'd paid :(

Matched that with a similar amount in FTSE250 stock. Just got back to break-even (gold down -1.5% stock up +1.5%, 1863/ounce price) so decided to close-out. Schools break up soon for their summer 6 week break, may wait until they're back to school or might re-enter if the FT250 and/or gold dip back down again, both feel a little 'up' ahead of Friday.

Edited by Bratnia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, gji25 said:

Really ?

 

empty vault.jpg

It (the gold) is there, assayed and sealed. The US Treasury own it, but for each ounce there's 100+ other paper claims to also own it. I wonder how that might work out. That's the vault showing the actual dollar value of all of the paper claims to the gold, a bit messy, they could have at least swept up those dollars on the floor and put them in a wallet/box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chronos said:

Japan Intervenes In FX Market To Crush Yen Shorts After Dovish CPI:

...in case you were wondering where permatwat Norman Lamont spends the summer.

‘Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.’

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, davejones said:

Is one or two interest cuts likely to devalue the pound and therefore increase the gold price towards the end of 2024?

If the BoE cuts before the Fed, yes, this would be expected to cause GBP to depreciate vs USD and thus boost the price of gold in GBP

The BoE waited longer to raise rates than the Fed and thus should wait longer to cut rates than the Fed.

The political situation is different on this side of the pond though, with there being heavy pressure from politicians and media within the UK to cut rates immediately. This pressure continues to mount in the face of our cost of living crisis, however, the woketards and non-financially savvy don't seem to understand that weakening GBP vs other currencies will cause MORE inflation, as the UK is a large net importer of things that matter to ordinary people - namely energy and food - which are not counted in the CPI.

The BoE is currently concerned with wage increases, inflation in the services sector and the tight job market - basically they're worried too many people are employed, their wages are rising and so too are the cost of services. These are hard-baked inflationary pressures and are a strong argument against cutting rates, at least according to Huw Pill (Chief Economist at the BoE)

BoE's Pill sees 'open question' on timing of first rate cut (msn.com) (Reuters)

Mind is primary and mass-energy is derivative

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use