Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Interesting Overdate on 1843 Sovereign -


ChardsCoinandBullionDealer

Recommended Posts

Hmm, here's an interesting conundrum. We're in the process of adding an unusual sovereign on to the website - and we have quite a few opinions in the office as to whether it is 3 over 2, a 3 over 8 or is it a rotated 2 under the 3? Or something else? We'd be interested in your thoughts - the fourth photo is a macro of the overdate. https://www.chards.co.uk/1843-overdate-gold-sovereign-vic-young-head-shield-london/4457

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Difficult to see from the magnified image. Really need a blow up of the date so that the whole of the 3 can be seen in one image, the bigger and hi-res the better:)

I also find it useful to take photos of the overdate from various angles to the side to see better the layering of the numbers.

Profile picture with thanks to Carl Vernon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, sovereignsteve said:

Difficult to see from the magnified image. Really need a blow up of the date so that the whole of the 3 can be seen in one image, the bigger and hi-res the better:)

I also find it useful to take photos of the overdate from various angles to the side to see better the layering of the numbers.

Good point, our photographer has started doing this too, a work in progress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ChardLizzie said:

Good point, our photographer has started doing this too, a work in progress.

Difficut to see what's going on under there. Doesn't help that the top 3 is so worn down. Wouldn't suprise me to learn that the engraver had a couple of abortive attempts at it!

Profile picture with thanks to Carl Vernon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ChardLizzie said:

It's going to the USA - can you imagine customs with the Blackpool rock :D

 

It's easy - just write 'DANGER - AVOID HIGH TEMPERATURE!' on the package.

No-one likes their rock to go limp :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Lizzie.

Well I blew it up - the number not the Rock, then I changed the colour several times to get a better aspect and I have it as a plain original rotated 3 over 3. The latter struck 3 is more worn on the top left but the original 3 is left intact being protected by the final strike.

Also the "bulge" mid RHS looks like the top RHS of the original rotated 3 - if that makes sense.

I must say at £800 someone has overpaid in my book unless they know better about what's going on with the coin? But there again its probably upped the value on mine!

I note that the I in Britanniarum is not the usual looking reversed 1. But it has the "Broken Foot" on the first N as normal - odd.

I've attached a "normal" 1843 for comparison.871c9d51a5587cde7504f540fc8050a1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use