Jump to content
  • The above Banner is a Sponsored Banner.

    Upgrade to Premium Membership to remove this Banner & All Google Ads. For full list of Premium Member benefits Click HERE.

  • Join The Silver Forum

    The Silver Forum is one of the largest and best loved silver and gold precious metals forums in the world, established since 2014. Join today for FREE! Browse the sponsor's topics (hidden to guests) for special deals and offers, check out the bargains in the members trade section and join in with our community reacting and commenting on topic posts. If you have any questions whatsoever about precious metals collecting and investing please join and start a topic and we will be here to help with our knowledge :) happy stacking/collecting. 21,000+ forum members and 1 million+ forum posts. For the latest up to date stats please see the stats in the right sidebar when browsing from desktop. Sign up for FREE to view the forum with reduced ads. 

Nazi Silver


SamGibsonBJJ

Recommended Posts

lolll and, simultaneously conflicted, oh dear. I wouldn't use the word comparison and....quick check...whew... i didn't. ? 

As your politicians are very fond of saying over the past year - let me be absolutely clear..... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply
15 hours ago, Jimmock said:

Really am finished with this debate now. ? Main reason being that we could all find and post different links supporting every theory under the sun and what it comes down to is that as individuals,we are all entitled  to believe what we believe, and long may that continue. Mind you interest could be peaked again,if somebody could find a good link to the fact that Nazis were in fact alien spacemen. ?

Its true, they built a base on the moon, it was in the Sunday Sport newspaper

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, swAgger said:

lolll and, simultaneously conflicted, oh dear. I wouldn't use the word comparison and....quick check...whew... i didn't. ? 

As your politicians are very fond of saying over the past year - let me be absolutely clear..... :)

I see now what you mean - discussion and free speech are good, but they should not be free and good at all. Your opinion would be right at home within a totalitarian regime! ?

10 hours ago, swAgger said:

Discussion and debate are all well and good, but there are some things i strongly feel people do not have any rights whatsoever to debate or question

That is why I laughed I thought you were making a joke. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything should be discussed!

It's interesting that people are suggesting some topics are taboo?

Technically, alcohol is a solution..

'It [socialism] poses a growing threat, however unintentional, to the freedom of this country, for there is no freedom where the State totally controls the economy. Personal freedom and economic freedom are indivisible. You can’t have one without the other. You can’t lose one without losing the other.'

"There is no such thing as public money, there is only taxpayers' money"

Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Roy said:

Everything should be discussed!

It's interesting that people are suggesting some topics are taboo?

Here here,  'Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it'  George Santayana, philosopher, essayist, poet, and novelist. 1863 - 1952.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing is taboo.

There are two types of topics, one where you are knowledgable, you talk and people listen.

And one where you know nothing, people talk and you listen.

I do smile though, who knew what a 'Nazi Silver' topic would become?

What about 'Rolf Harris paintings'?

Technically, alcohol is a solution..

'It [socialism] poses a growing threat, however unintentional, to the freedom of this country, for there is no freedom where the State totally controls the economy. Personal freedom and economic freedom are indivisible. You can’t have one without the other. You can’t lose one without losing the other.'

"There is no such thing as public money, there is only taxpayers' money"

Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roy said:

Nothing is taboo.

There are two types of topics, one where you are knowledgable, you talk and people listen.

And one where you know nothing, people talk and you listen.

I do smile though, who knew what a 'Nazi Silver' topic would become?

What about 'Rolf Harris paintings'?

 Oh now you done it, well done thats another can of worms opened.

 

2007-1-Australian-Kangaroo-1-oz-Silver.jpg.f336615fce422af730bb4919bb58ef9d.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG!

Technically, alcohol is a solution..

'It [socialism] poses a growing threat, however unintentional, to the freedom of this country, for there is no freedom where the State totally controls the economy. Personal freedom and economic freedom are indivisible. You can’t have one without the other. You can’t lose one without losing the other.'

"There is no such thing as public money, there is only taxpayers' money"

Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KDave said:

I see now what you mean - discussion and free speech are good, but they should not be free and good at all. Your opinion would be right at home within a totalitarian regime! ?

That is why I laughed I thought you were making a joke. ?

Whatever. Have at it and enjoy yourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, swAgger said:

but there are some things i strongly feel people do not have any rights whatsoever to debate or question, no matter how educated, entitled, or enlightened we think we are.

seriously?

sounds to me like the "liberal"/"socialist" reaction of shouting opponents down when they dare try to open discussions on topics you don't like. If you disagree with someone just call them fascist, racist, ****phobic etc, just pick one.

I take it you want to be the one who decides what we can all discuss?

Profile picture with thanks to Carl Vernon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sovereignsteve said:

seriously?

sounds to me like the "liberal"/"socialist" reaction of shouting opponents down when they dare try to open discussions on topics you don't like. If you disagree with someone just call them fascist, racist, ****phobic etc, just pick one.

I take it you want to be the one who decides what we can all discuss?

I would ask that you not misunderstand my meaning. Or if you did understand my meaning, not to twist it. This topic has not been all harmless and innocent discussion, so don’t try to imply different. The topic is fine. I even liked a post that gave good info on the coinage of the period, and have no objection to anyone having an interest in the coinage (or the period). They’re historical artifacts. And yes, it’s a dark era and needs to be understood and learned from, as someone else said.

You have taken my quote and ran with it as a general disapproval of any discussion of the period. In fact i was referring to some things within such discussions that nobody has a right to put up for debate or question. “some”. And yes i stand by that. Specifically, debating the finer points of whether statistically the holocaust was really all that it was made out to be. Or after all, were they so bad really when you compare and contrast to these other guys. Because it comes across as attempted revisionist. Topics then cease to be about respectful discussion, and instead dive into deliberate baiting. People ask why does this era invoke such emotion and can’t be discussed rationally. It’s because it may begin rationally, but always ends up straying down that distasteful path by some. There is no discussion that should be worth your efforts defending which has within it suggestions to entertain or muse whether a regime got handed an unfair rap, for "discussion" sake. The weight of generations of scholars and historians and most importantly the survivors, is there, and that's the imperative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I strongly disagree, everything should be open for debate. The truth is more important than hurt feelings, there should be no safe spaces, nothing should be off limits. Steve is correct your position is entirely political.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, swAgger said:

I would ask that you not misunderstand my meaning. Or if you did understand my meaning, not to twist it. This topic has not been all harmless and innocent discussion, so don’t try to imply different. The topic is fine. I even liked a post that gave good info on the coinage of the period, and have no objection to anyone having an interest in the coinage (or the period). They’re historical artifacts. And yes, it’s a dark era and needs to be understood and learned from, as someone else said.

You have taken my quote and ran with it as a general disapproval of any discussion of the period. In fact i was referring to some things within such discussions that nobody has a right to put up for debate or question. “some”. And yes i stand by that. Specifically, debating the finer points of whether statistically the holocaust was really all that it was made out to be. Or after all, were they so bad really when you compare and contrast to these other guys. Because it comes across as attempted revisionist. Topics then cease to be about respectful discussion, and instead dive into deliberate baiting. People ask why does this era invoke such emotion and can’t be discussed rationally. It’s because it may begin rationally, but always ends up straying down that distasteful path by some. There is no discussion that should be worth your efforts defending which has within it suggestions to entertain or muse whether a regime got handed an unfair rap, for "discussion" sake. The weight of generations of scholars and historians and most importantly the survivors, is there, and that's the imperative.

Nobody is suggesting that certain regimes got a bad rap.

I personally find it strange that  Nazi symbols such as the Swastika are reviled but the Hammer and Sickle or the Red Star are somehow acceptable or less bad than a Swastika.

Image result for jeremy corbyn red star

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think maintaining a healthy open debate is the very foundation of a world in which we all wish to live. And the ability to listen to others is as valuable a skill as having one’s own opinion and retaining the right to be flexible and see things from the other side. Carry on:)

 

As an aside, I once spent a month surfing without any access to the world other than what was in front of me and when I finally hooked back in, nothing had changed and I had not missed a single thing of any importance......best month of my life ! Scored some nice waves, beers, stories, suntan, smiles and friends along with some epic bbqs :)

 

I applaud everyone on this thread for keeping it civil and interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So on a totally different subject should we not collect Victorian sovereigns minted in South Africa because if I am not wrong WE the British started a wee war with the Boer or Afrikaners and it was us who invented the concentration camp as well. Bad Brits. Lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, mondy41 said:

@PansPurse - this has turned into a straw man argument - I have never heard this expression before very interesting.  I am always intrigued by such things. My new thing for the day:)

 

Here's three more for you that we have a huge problem with in society these days, snowflake generation,  virtue signallers and SJW's  ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Cookies & terms of service

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies and to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use