Martlet

Trillions of derivatives in so many different markets, say a market can do this, quite legally. 
The question is where can market demand not be met without price impact over time.  Why are there not buyers in secondary, bidding up physical at ever increasing prices above the market rate?  Isn't that what you'd expect if there were so much unmet demand? 

This issue is all about silver, both for the full effect. 

There's a rational explaination, that market only want the derivative, not the physical product. 
You can continue to believe demand that is unmet with price unaffected, with no spill over into secondary markets.  I cant. 

Bottom line is price reflects wider supply/demand of the market.  Whatever shenanigans in the daily price action, if buyers cant acquire the product they require they will raise the price until their demand is met.  So the silver price approximates to supply/demand.  If as claimed its suppressed, there's either huge unmet demand that just accept not obtaining their product, or supply that continues to under sell their product.  Its irrational and nonsense this state would be stustained. 

Only affording one in gold I think (like i'll even get in the door), portrait is far more preferable. 

Couldnt let that pass, Thatcher a Keynesian? 

There's a difference between supporting and accepting.  I do the latter and treat metals as a hedge against a reaction to the excess.  As part of that acceptance, I dont buy into the thesis that, with a playground of trillions of $ in hundreds of different markets, there is a group out to suppress two markets long term.  It is difficult and expensive to push down prices over long periods, I'm yet to hear where the unmet demand is that's being suppressed all this time. 

Bottom line is price reflects wider supply/demand of the market.  Whatever shenanigans in the daily price action, if buyers cant acquire the product they require they will raise the price until their demand is met.  So the silver price approximates to supply/demand.  If as claimed its suppressed, there's either huge unmet demand that just accept not obtaining their product, or supply that continues to under sell their product.  Its irrational and nonsense this state would be stustained. 

It's a interesting read, even tho most of you can't agree. Out of interest, why would you be invested in a market you believe is manipulated? Can't be healthy for the head.

I can see the problem here. Theres a difference between how one would like things to be, and how the world actual works. We adapt to it or howl at the moon about how wrong it all is. That is lunacy. 

There's a rational explaination, that market only want the derivative, not the physical product. 
You can continue to believe demand that is unmet with price unaffected, with no spill over into secondary markets.  I cant. 

He is a great commentator and very knowledgable. This is a real shame if true! It is nice to read posts from actual knowledgable people rather than strange conspiracies.

I wouldn't classify crypto, the traditional Bitcoin, Ethereum etc.. as a digital currency. Digital currencies will be centralised and government/central bankster controlled.
The whole purpose of Bitcoin was to be decentralised. Where there needs to be quorum to validate the blockchain and the transactions upon it. 
Yes, this could in theory be controlled if a country/government entity were to be able to successfully gain more than 50% of the nodes of said blockchain, but the premise of decentralisation is at the heart of crypto.
It is also immutable, so that all transactions can be validated and seen forever. Something that the goverments and central banksters definitely don't want!

Is there evidence of this?  And i dont mean from goldbug youtube speculation, actual commentry from general economic or news sources.  I have no doubt Chinese move to a digital currency, just not gold backed.  If we mean a crypto based digital currency, it would be a contradiction as the crypto algo secures and gives confidence to the currency, gold or silver arent necessary. 

Ok, if this correct...
What will we do with our gold? How do we convert it to a gold backed digital currency?
Will it be revalued like 1933?
Will we have to accept the government's potentially criminal exchange rates? Black markets?
 

It's about people who want their personal ideals on economics to be real, even if the world has moved to a different place with different rules.  The debt that the world lives on wont disappear, its how economies function now.  No country would return to hard money, except out of desperation - their control and currency is in such a poor state that they need to secure it with something.  

It's about people who want their personal ideals on economics to be real, even if the world has moved to a different place with different rules.  The debt that the world lives on wont disappear, its how economies function now.  No country would return to hard money, except out of desperation - their control and currency is in such a poor state that they need to secure it with something.  

Maybe you could constructed a consistent argument rather than go direct to insults?  
 

The main one on Chards is forgetting filters when you go back.  There's been a few others over the years, but either fixed or i dont notice anymore.  Its a good one really.  
Other sites have some issues with mouse over, while others cant align text or assume you will have full/wide window. 

The main one on Chards is forgetting filters when you go back.  There's been a few others over the years, but either fixed or i dont notice anymore.  Its a good one really.  
Other sites have some issues with mouse over, while others cant align text or assume you will have full/wide window. 

To be fair the BBP website is one of the best out there in my opinion.  Many are quirky in some way.  (sorry). 

To be fair the BBP website is one of the best out there in my opinion.  Many are quirky in some way.  (sorry). 

I've watched CNBC off and on over the years.  Good source of general market sentiment, analysts, fund manager and CEO views, piped into the corner of the room.  

If you would prefer to buy a fund, there is the Global X Uranium ETF (URA), or on London there is Geiger Counter (GCL.L). If you just want to own uranium rather than uranium stocks, there is Yellow Cake (YCA.L). If you want to keep your own uranium at home, don't store it all in one place, because your home insurance probably doesn't cover you for the risk.

Maybe you could constructed a consistent argument rather than go direct to insults?