HawkHybrid

there is a time and a place for everything.
nothing goes up in a straight line.
for metals to correct might take years/decades.
consider this, it's been decades since the height of the british empire. yet each £ is still worth
more than $1. currently the top economy in the world yet each $ can't buy a £. how is that logical?
answer is it's not. but it takes time. the decades that have past is not yet enough time.
 
unless an emergency, in the night, if you run out of milk, it can wait till the morning.
there is a time and a place for everything.
 
(just so that you know that I'm not having a go at you personally. we've all been known to only
hold rock, come hell or high water. there is no shame in holding rock, everyone has done it. once
you've learnt to hold rock, you can use it as a stepping stone to discover more.)
 
there is a time when it's favourable to hold physical silver. but the charts say that that time is not
here yet. I never heard any forum 'price suppression' objections a few years ago when I said it was
favourable to hold gold for at least a few months or more. why do all these objections suddenly
appear when I say the price is likely to (overall)fall over the next 6 months or so?
 
for the trading of gold, a century amounts to next to nothing. for a person waiting, a century is a
lifetime wasted.
 
HH

how convenient he is not disputing the numbers that have annual production accounts to back them up.
but he's vague about which numbers he's does think they are making up.
(he can't be wrong then can he, ... it's not those numbers either, so keep on guessing)
sounds like he's full of ****.
 
and you openly dismiss thesilverinstitutes figures knowing that at least their mining production
figures are close enough to being correct. and you base this on a keith neumeyers word?
his word that is so vague it cannot be verified either way?
 
(doesn't knowing the mining production mean that you know most of the supply side of things?
there's only two sides to the equation, demand and supply. and you already know most of the
supply side.)
 
HH

this is a real problem if one of them happen to be keith neumeyer talking about silver demand.
let me spell it out what I'm thinking so it's clearer.
keith neumeyer has no honour as,
he is bad mouthing thesilverinstitute to have untrustworthy figures,
figures which are identical to his own.
all of which I can''t prove.
 
you can look up the data but I tallied the figures for one of the years of all of the significant silver mining
production(official annual report figures). the total came close enough (%) to the number shown by
thesilverinstitute for that year. feel free to do the maths yourself if you don't believe me.
I expect the 1 billion toz figure is correct or close enough.
anyone can prove or disprove this but nobody here seems to be willing to spend the time to do the maths.
but then again people here are full of talk. unwilling to do the maths. first to dismiss the findings of someone
who has done some of the maths, purely on the basis that it's result doesn't fit the prejudice.
 
HH

there is a time and a place for everything.
nothing goes up in a straight line.
for metals to correct might take years/decades.
consider this, it's been decades since the height of the british empire. yet each £ is still worth
more than $1. currently the top economy in the world yet each $ can't buy a £. how is that logical?
answer is it's not. but it takes time. the decades that have past is not yet enough time.
 
unless an emergency, in the night, if you run out of milk, it can wait till the morning.
there is a time and a place for everything.
 
(just so that you know that I'm not having a go at you personally. we've all been known to only
hold rock, come hell or high water. there is no shame in holding rock, everyone has done it. once
you've learnt to hold rock, you can use it as a stepping stone to discover more.)
 
there is a time when it's favourable to hold physical silver. but the charts say that that time is not
here yet. I never heard any forum 'price suppression' objections a few years ago when I said it was
favourable to hold gold for at least a few months or more. why do all these objections suddenly
appear when I say the price is likely to (overall)fall over the next 6 months or so?
 
for the trading of gold, a century amounts to next to nothing. for a person waiting, a century is a
lifetime wasted.
 
HH

keith neumeyer must be right,
but you can't explain to me why his figure of 1 billion toz in demand is correct when the same 1 billion toz in demand
claimed by the thesilverinstitute is made up?
 
and yet you insist on taking his word as if it were gospel?
 
you know what is actually virtually worthless?...
 
HH

here's the truth, in 2014 when I first got into metals I had all the same thoughts about the fed, printing etc that
you have now.(I've been there and have the coin dated physical silver to prove it) so don't make it out like it's
a revelation. the difference is I cross examined the figures that I can work out to be credible and they don't
match with information(which I now understand to be conspiracy theories). either all the figures from all the
different sources are wrong or the theories are wrong. so voicing to not buy silver at the highs hasn't done my
forum rep any good but have saved me from larger paper losses.
you can make progress(scissors and paper also exists) or,
you can take rock every time?
 
HH

hand waving does not constitute evidence.
actually evidence is figures that can be calculated such as those from
https://www.silverinstitute.org/silver-supply-demand/
all of which you dismiss because they are evidence that prove what you currently have is not the whole truth.
 
the harsh reality is that you are being brainwashed into taking losing bets on silver by the physical silver pumpers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0SoKWLkmLU
lisa physical silver pumper: 'poor predictable bart minimalist, always takes rock silver'
bart minimalist: good ol' rock silver, nothing beats that'
 
HH

there is a time and a place for everything.
nothing goes up in a straight line.
for metals to correct might take years/decades.
consider this, it's been decades since the height of the british empire. yet each £ is still worth
more than $1. currently the top economy in the world yet each $ can't buy a £. how is that logical?
answer is it's not. but it takes time. the decades that have past is not yet enough time.
 
unless an emergency, in the night, if you run out of milk, it can wait till the morning.
there is a time and a place for everything.
 
(just so that you know that I'm not having a go at you personally. we've all been known to only
hold rock, come hell or high water. there is no shame in holding rock, everyone has done it. once
you've learnt to hold rock, you can use it as a stepping stone to discover more.)
 
there is a time when it's favourable to hold physical silver. but the charts say that that time is not
here yet. I never heard any forum 'price suppression' objections a few years ago when I said it was
favourable to hold gold for at least a few months or more. why do all these objections suddenly
appear when I say the price is likely to (overall)fall over the next 6 months or so?
 
for the trading of gold, a century amounts to next to nothing. for a person waiting, a century is a
lifetime wasted.
 
HH

a strong dollar does not mean there is no inflation.
inflation is linked to the strength of the dollar.
the strength of the dollar is not linked to inflation.
 
similar to how a murderer is a criminal, but a criminal is not a murderer.
a question might produce an answer but an answer does not determine the question.
 
HH

It means the momentum is positive 
Especially when the 50/100/200 are under in correct alignment
Do you need any more help? 

First of all, Welcome to stacking! And i agree with the people above. I can't answer your question. I do recognize your method in mine though. I had no idea what I was doing when I started stacking. I bought silver and sold some on highs, then realizing I had to buy more silver with my winnings when the price was even higher, and eventually (after making some profit) i ended up with less silver in weight for the same price I started with. 🤔
So i do have a couple questions for you.
1: What will you do with the money you now save each month if you won't buy any more silver? (Invest? let the bank hold it? spend it on life?)
2: How long will you sit back, and what will you be waiting for? (Will you hold it forever or sell at a certain point?)
 
In other words, I think you need a strategy. And your strategy will answer your question.
 

a price prediction without a time frame lacks context and hence lacks insight.
imagine a best before end that reads 'unsuitable for consumption some time in the future' 
with context you can work out how realistic a prediction is.
 
(just so that it's clear. actual experts always give a time frame as they have a track record of how
many times they've been correct in the past. they don't have 'I'm never wrong because there's
unlimited amount of time for my prediction to be correct'. needless to say that those that do not
give a time frame all lack expertise in the field.)
 
HH

1979-1990
May she be rotting in Hell.

imo a stacker holds quantity and a collector holds pieces of a story.
an important difference is when it comes to exit strategy. stackers can offload in bulk by weight
with the price determined mostly by spot. collectors have more individual items to sell, maybe
as part of a set or organised historic representation.
price determined by weight = stacker
price determined by appearance = collector
 
HH

I vote bullion gold sovereigns.
it is one of the most forgiving for beginner error.
 
HH

I vote bullion gold sovereigns.
it is one of the most forgiving for beginner error.
 
HH

exit strategy?
if you work backwards from your exit strategy, then what you should be accumulating now
will hopefully become clearer.
 
HH

edward VII, george V sovereigns etc are cgt free. why do you believe other non currency
cgt free coins will change their cgt free status when there is a monarch change?
 
HH

I don't. the internet is a great source of data but a poor source of information.
you don't need to know everything about everything. you don't need to blindly jump onto what might
be the next big thing. plenty of people get on with doing whatever they know best.
when have any broadcaster that you've watched actually got it right in a time frame that could have
been useful to you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGLizqPiCa4
anytime that some maybe useful information is actually available it's completely padded out with 'I'm
not against silver'.
 
what you should be asking yourself is how can I recognise good information if I come across it?
 
HH

I don't. the internet is a great source of data but a poor source of information.
you don't need to know everything about everything. you don't need to blindly jump onto what might
be the next big thing. plenty of people get on with doing whatever they know best.
when have any broadcaster that you've watched actually got it right in a time frame that could have
been useful to you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGLizqPiCa4
anytime that some maybe useful information is actually available it's completely padded out with 'I'm
not against silver'.
 
what you should be asking yourself is how can I recognise good information if I come across it?
 
HH

I vote specific gravity test.
(it's affordable without the need to strain your eyes)
 
HH

I vote specific gravity test.
(it's affordable without the need to strain your eyes)
 
HH

you need skin care tips from the immortal jellyfish,... we all do 
 
HH

I vote specific gravity test.
(it's affordable without the need to strain your eyes)
 
HH

the fact is that gold is currently doing exactly what it's supposed to do.
 
HH